Skip Navigation, Sitemap

Alloa & Hillfoots Advertiser

Published: Wednesday, 17th June, 2009 12:05pm

Public 'misled' over night freight trains

Comments (6) | Print | Email

MILLIONS of pounds in compensation payments could be made to residents living close to the Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine (SAK) railway line after promises over the running of night trains were broken.

As previously reported in the Advertiser, people staying close to the line have been up in arms since trains carrying coal to Longannet began using the line during the night.

This was despite promises that no trains would use the line between 11pm and 6am.

Yet it has now been claimed that Transport Scotland knew even before the line was re-opened that freight trains would run on the line at night.

And Mid Scotland and Fife MSP Dr Richard Simpson has accused Transport Scotland of misleading the public, claiming they had given explicit undertakings there would be no night trains.

Dr Simpson said, 'Transport Scotland implicitly and explicitly gave undertakings that there would be no night trains.

'I think they have misled the public. That"s what is most shocking.'

Dr Simpson has raised in the Scottish Parliament the issue of possible compensation for residents living near the line.

And Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson has admitted that compensation may be payable to residents whose property has been devalued.

The freight train operator DB Schenker said that early in 2008, and well in advance of the line re-opening, EWS (the freight train operator at that time) advised both Transport Scotland and Network Rail that it would require 24 hour running, six days a week.

And, in a recent letter sent to Clackmannanshire Council, DB Schenker stated that its night trains had to run to Longannet to meet the power plant"s coal needs and that all parties had known about this since the line reopened.

A spokesperson added, 'In order to transfer the coal trains from the Forth Bridge to the Alloa line, the trains needed to be timetabled over a 24 hour period, six days a week.

'It should be noted that on day seven, Network Rail completes essential maintenance and renewal of the rail network.

'DB Schenker"s customer requires up to 12 trains of coal to be delivered per day, six days a week. Without this Longannet Power Station would have insufficient product to meet the electricity requirements of Scotland.'

The freight company said the timetable it is using accomodates the loading duration, transport time from Ayrshire to Longannet Power Station and the discharge period in the station.

All these elements, it says, require trains to operate around the clock, six days a week. This enables the coal trains to be moved away from the Forth Bridge at Transport Scotland"s request.

The spokesperson added, 'DB Schenker is aware that residents on the line of the route were informed that trains would not operate at night. We are unable to comment on why this pledge was made - that is for the parties who made it to comment on.'

During a parliamentary debate at Holyrood last week on the issue, Michael Matheson MSP called on Network Rail and DB Schenker to work towards implementing a speed restriction on the route.

But a briefing by Network Rail, which is responsible for rail infrastructure, claimed it couldn"t impose any speed restrictions unless there were safety issues involved.

Margaret Mitchell, Scottish Conservative MSP for Central Scotland, called for a 'swift resolution' for the sake of the residents living alongside the line.

She said that the previous Scottish Executive and the current Scottish Government must accept some culpability, after pledges that no trains would run between 11pm and 6am were not upheld.

And she expressed her concern that everyone, including the Government, Transport Scotland and Network Rail, appeared to be running for cover now that compensation claims were live.

Ms Mitchell added, 'When the SAK Line opened, Transport Scotland claimed that the timetable had been developed to minimise early morning and late evening services.

'Both Transport Scotland and the Scottish Government"s Executive Agency knew of the problem but both have apparently been powerless to prevent the rail operator from requesting and implementing a 24 hour timetable.'

Clackmannanshire Council has, so far, received 27 formal claims for compensation from those who have been forced to live with the noise and believe their property has dropped in value. These claims have been passed to Network Rail as the infrastructure owner.

Councillor Eddie Carrick, Sustainability Portfolio Holder, said, 'The council only became aware of the proposal to operate overnight services in May 2008. It was not until around August or September that we had it confirmed that overnight services would operate. At that stage we had no idea how many trains there would be overnight or what the likely disturbance would be.

'The council will provide mitigation to qualifying properties.'

Transport Scotland said the operation of freight services and the timing of these was a matter for the rail industry and was outwith its remit.

A spokesperson said, 'We acknowledges the concern expressed by residents adjoining the new railway, especially since freight trains commenced operation at night.

'We are working closely with Network Rail and the council to address concerns about noise and vibration as quickly as possible.'

Have your say. Post a comment on this article.

  • ChrisB
    Unregistered User
    Jun 19, 07:31
    Comment: 3314

    This whole fiasco is characterised byrna) the incompetence of the parties who managed this project in the early stages

    b) DB Schenker's arrogance and somewhat disingenuous responses

    Maybe Schenker could spend some money on better rolling stock as it is their trains, not Freightliner's, causing the problem.

    If the power station needs 12 deliveries of coal a day, and there are 24 hours in the day, do the maths. There is no need for trains all night.

    Trains can be routed back over the Forth Bridge at night. The congestion on the bridge is a daytime problem.
    Report this comment

  • Hazelkaye
    Unregistered User
    Jun 19, 22:58
    Comment: 3320

    It's still a NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) story,

    whatever slant you wish to put upon it!
    Report this comment

  • scotty
    Unregistered User
    Jun 24, 08:20
    Comment: 3352

    clearly not a problem in Hazelkaye's back yard.

    I'm one of the moaners about overnight trains, and personally i don't mind the trains during the day. I bought a house beside a disused railway line, i'm not disputing that, and yes your being naive if you think there is no chance of it ever reopening.

    BUT, we were promised there would be no trains at night and for what ever reason i'm guessing the rolling stock is practicularly old, but some trains in particular ie the 3am train is exceptionally noisy. It without fail wakens the whole household every single night.

    Now this i have to say is clearly a resolvable problem, ideal yeah we want everyone to keep their promise and stop the trains overnight, but at the very least they need to change the rolling stock they are using for that run at the very least.

    Its easy for anyone not directly affected to make out we are all just moaning and don't want the trains at all. But this is affecting our quality of life and the fact that something can be done to decrease the effects as well as the fact we were LIED to by numerous parties, have just inflamed the whole situation.

    So this is clearly a SEP (Someone Else's Problem) to a lot of folks out there, but i for one am not saying NIMBY, i'm just saying NIMBY OVERNIGHT.
    Report this comment

  • Hazelkaye
    Unregistered User
    Jun 25, 21:13
    Comment: 3374

    Scotty, well said but I'd rather have the trains than 100s of lorries rumbling past!

    I'm a bit deaf (and over 60) but the earth can still 'move' for me on occasions with these night-time trains that 'rattle' me - but only if I'm half awake/asleep!
    Report this comment

  • tc
    Unregistered User
    Jul 15, 14:10
    Comment: 3640

    Whilst I do have every sympathy for the folk that are suffering from the noise nuisance created by the rail line I feel very strongly that they should not be paid compensation from the tax payers purse.

    My justification for this is two-fold; the line itself has NEVER been decommissioned, indeed it has continually featured as an evacuation option within the disaster plan for the area. This has been the case from the day it was ‘closed' and the line has always therefore been classed as available for use. Secondly these properties prices should have reflected the proximity to the railway line; if this was not advised to all new purchasers then it is surely their property advisers (Solicitors & Surveyors) that should be pursued for suitable recompense.

    Force the rail freight operators to use NEW rolling stock and it would also help, they appear to be putting profit before any corporate social responsibilty.
    Report this comment

  • Griffin
    Unregistered User
    Jul 28, 21:47
    Comment: 3875

    A quick glance of this issue at the Scottish Parliament website indicates Dr Richard Simpson, MSP has asked the Scottish Govt. 19 times on this issue. Still no answers from them.

    The Scottish Govt. and Keith Brown in particular were all quick to stand in front of the flash bulbs for photo opportunities when the rail line was complete yet have failed to give any clear answers on this ongoing issue.

    Wonder why?
    Report this comment

Post a comment

Registered users log in here

If you are registered with us, you can login here. If you are not registered, do so now.
Once logged in you wont have to complete word verification each time you post.

Prefer not to register?

Usernames must be 4 - 20 characters. Registration only takes a few minutes. Registered users can also take part in competitions and other features of the site.


Enter the text as shown.

I want to...

Photosales Search

Looking for a picture from the newspaper?
Visit our photosales site and search now.

Vote

Alloa & Hillfoots Advertiser Poll

Have you made up your mind who to vote for?

This Poll is now closed.

Yes (83.5%)

No (6.1%)

I would need to hear more (5.2%)

I won't vote at all (5.2%)

News from around the area