Schools across Scotland have been affected by this year's SQA exam results fiasco.
After the cancellation of exams, a system was put in place, which drew on schools' previous results to alter grades, to ensure that pupils were fairly awarded results.
However, this lead to pupils from poorer backgrounds being hit hardest by the grade adjustments.
Mr Swinney made a dramatic u-turn after public backlash which resulted in teacher estimates alone being used to set grades this year given the "unique" circumstances created by the coronavirus crisis.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon to give update on temporary Covid-19 restrictions - here's what we know
Data has now been released by the SQA under Freedom of Information legislation which shows the percentage of pupils at every Scottish school whose grades were marked down, increased and which went from a pass to a fail.
The schools which had the highest level of Highers adjusted from 'pass' to 'fail' was Eastbank Academy in Shettleston, Glasgow, at 26.8%, with data showing that Fernhill School, Rutherglen, only had 1.4% of grades changed from 'pass to fail'.
Mintlaw Academy in Peterhead had 13.4% of Highers adjusted up with Alloa Academy, Dollar Academy, George Heriot's School, John Paul Academy, Lochgelly High School and Turnbull High School only having a 0.1% rise in Highers.
READ MORE: Which is the best school in Scotland? | Secondary schools ranked
Many schools saw their Highers grades reduced, with Loretto School, Musselburgh, experiencing a 60% decrease and St Ninian's High School, Giffnock, had 57.1% of Highers adjusted down.
The school with the least highers downgraded was Cedars School Of Excellence in Greenock.
Our table below shows the percentage of exam results adjusted from a pass to a fail, the percentage adjusted up and the percentage adjusted down.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here